From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 1 07:36:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E10B60EBE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7658129B for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 62so9998618pfd.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VsQyAD4dtJyS3xTOX12a3tqCYIU5re8bA9IIH18pjFE=; b=W8wxTTOHNtEIE+IoMCJAke5j7CnsbL8yCl9V/5QLSv8oLRZxBHfQa5crLaT0Vk0qj8 vS+BZqcc8+v57/d8s4Z3PYeWuCidg2qw99gyiTtHhjVcE/Lywidovnxzg+vQ0f80Eqtc HQfjsOSSmKK129iShj/cqOwUyiuy6MqZnnMMM0pEdf92EOCQLG1Gw6OrFB6J8yZuZGh0 dcWyzWTOHBiVpxXrTjzFaxs5huMGVeU8LvJ/eb5LaEW1JUYz+ZbsOEV5emK1VfJTOCp5 u1Cjfdo2acWM0xbdJtXHk94CQvujAiszLOE5cPvOMFUEsHDZD8lWBMzwWGZyPAwbgWkb MaTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VsQyAD4dtJyS3xTOX12a3tqCYIU5re8bA9IIH18pjFE=; b=AtJJf2et/4Vc67QGPHjbsXlFBNyCo4d3VDPSJoIc0o15YWAFr6+4dDonI+/Y3Z8reF NV9yokjTxx8qS0d2xS83geThSZ5OS8+IyQbsuQNVBPtQV9yTu+CeRgclyefIVvhx9YlK OZ51TVxQTey7Np5XDac446EGjhIIz6ZI37RNa6YdgD9mDhKsYDigPKy3xhEp93F02TYQ 1iPwprxNY9LnhhWAEUXcLsUP+gvn2p0vcp6VlCKqyS/SoMLHQOFdl/dCbT6maN/UEsQ9 u5dopt9XJejpFqpUdszkYUYMfK+5huMJcYjWQedZX8FfwVTmy2qK0CKDUC7Fd+Iz2+3w 8eug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLl0lL3fY9EqyOq2rCDTfVcbgXQe3IWG5rmwZktCyrPeTE9wa0FnoEkovMRI/SMTw== X-Received: by 10.98.4.195 with SMTP id 186mr345680pfe.98.1464766575261; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ox ([2601:641:c180:c600:adf2:ffc8:42b9:33e1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm60071681pax.24.2016.06.01.00.36.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:36:12 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: 11.0 -r300944 build*KERNEL* via amd64-gcc fails for: .../dev/cxgb/ulp/tom/cxgb_listen.c:926:13: error: redundant redeclaration of 'tcp_dooptions'; cxgbe has an issue too Message-ID: <20160601073612.GB4400@ox> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Millard , FreeBSD Current References: <1885ED2D-29CB-47EF-B746-7CAD52E91605@dsl-only.net> <086B90E6-2E0C-4AA9-B429-523685EF1459@dsl-only.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <086B90E6-2E0C-4AA9-B429-523685EF1459@dsl-only.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:36:16 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:49:29PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-May-31, at 10:31 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > If the offending declaration in cxgb_listen.c is commented out (or removed) > there is a "next problem" but for cxgbe: > > > --- all_subdir_cxgbe/tom --- > > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/tom/../../../dev/cxgbe/tom/t4_listen.c: In function 'do_pass_accept_req': > > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/tom/../../../dev/cxgbe/tom/t4_listen.c:640:1: warning: inlining failed in call to 'release_synqe': call is unlikely and code size would grow [-Winline] Can you try removing the "inline" at line 639 in t4_listen.c and see if that makes a difference? Regards, Navdeep