From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 2 10:46:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86798B88CF5 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s17.hotmail.com [65.55.111.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4139A245B for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sat, 2 Jul 2016 03:45:49 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=06nlbHxrjvWOyfuDT954Hzo2VXE97fMlYQZp7L3oDgI=; b=QxYIDVJNyKxwspcTKXd8NnJ/07rzeOUO0iV3FDgf+HxHaafKbXAImDM4/Aode5msse5NWlNGDcB6++lVpP8u6anVRDKsvbXsqgSPeftszr3+FKUmkrUByStNWyoNUhS9nHHO18+PeMeDAwyiDIgbQ2H4fE5CjlPeZJcS09xwfAZnTqvNwRrg78lYYtXId2zcaGYIC1h7FghmOa5hrfzgNchOLiL5rX1cEhuMvrGpXiAtQlATH04sfZqo/pWekb7BG6ROdV936dVHXrdBPo55bPPy4WN3hgOwH+xCMbLrZqlh2mEwV15RE8WhRGAuew8J8vgORrWyRadUdGpD1lnJzw== Received: from BY2NAM03FT064.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.52) by BY2NAM03HT082.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.534.7; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:45:47 +0000 Received: from SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.84.56) by BY2NAM03FT064.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.534.7 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:45:47 +0000 Received: from SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.198.13]) by SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.198.13]) with mapi id 15.01.0534.015; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:45:46 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable Thread-Topic: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable Thread-Index: AQHR1E7jNRMJjBhjj066Gy2crCmIZA== Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:45:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <201607020225.u622Pfbc094491@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201607020225.u622Pfbc094491@gw.catspoiler.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.84.56) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=outlook.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning outlook.com discourages use of 10.152.84.56 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.84.56; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT082; H:SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2fce2195-9c50-4d6a-bb53-08d3a26605ec x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(5061506196)(5061507196)(1603103041)(1601125047); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT082; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT082; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT082; x-forefront-prvs: 0991CAB7B3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <370C4BE49278654CBF8946682A0968E3@namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jul 2016 10:45:46.6212 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM03HT082 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2016 10:45:49.0188 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5695C40:01D1D44E] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 10:46:56 -0000 I have to admit that this whole discussion has gotten me confused. I use "openssl" from ports, always have and probably always will. I use to use the now apparently depreciate statement in the /etc/make.conf file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3DYES >From what I am reading, I would replace that line with the following statement: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D ssl=3Dopenssl to force the use of the "ports" version of "openssl". Is that correct, or is my interpretation of this incorrect? Thanks --=20 Carmel