From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 08:08:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36B616A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:08:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB98E43D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ml@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8U8AHaF028138; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:10:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ml@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ml@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8U8AHF1028137; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:10:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ml) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:10:17 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin To: freebsd Message-ID: <20040930081017.GA28115@phantom.cris.net> References: <415BB528.9020702@gazeta.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415BB528.9020702@gazeta.pl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java support for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:08:16 -0000 hi, No status yet. The first supported release (native amd64) will be jdk 5.0 and in by plans amd64 support will be added after i386 port is created. On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:26:32AM +0200, freebsd wrote: > Hi, > Anyone can tell me what is status of native java port for AMD64 platform? > Same question should consider eclipse - native java required - so if we > get native java for AMD64, we should get running all other stuff such as > eclipse, tomcat, or it's much more problematic? > I would appreciate any URLs answering this problem, could be private if > this question isn't in focus now.