From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 20:34:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF1A16A4E2; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6572443D1D; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1280114316; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:34:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:34:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20040821202611.GA85102@gothmog.gr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org cc: ceri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To PR Senders X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:34:57 -0000 On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Do kernel configs or dmesg -v output count as log files too? These can > easily exceed 20 KB, since a non-verbose dmesg output is almost 15 KB in > a recent -CURRENT: Well, what do people think? Are these really useful for enough people to let them sit around in GNATS? I would think that most of our kernel people have high-speed connections ... I mean, if there are only a handful of people who are in a position to understand the problem, I don't see the reason to clutter up the database. mcl