From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 11:33:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077F016A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A9A43FBD for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9MIXPaT044280; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:33:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h9MIXPNm044279; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:33:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h9MIXsWl071990; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:33:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Message-Id: <200310221833.h9MIXsWl071990@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Mike Tancsa From: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:34:38 EDT." <6.0.0.22.0.20031022132622.081f4058@209.112.4.2> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:33:54 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware crypto and SSL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:33:28 -0000 Mike Tancsa writes: > >There are still some issues to work out in the driver but between > >Jason and I it should be well supported in time. The big win is that > >it's got AES and PK support and should be inexpensive. > > That would be excellent! I am anxious to try this newer card > in conjunction with PHK's encrypted file system when 5.2 comes > out. Actually, the encrypted GEOM BDE would make use of the crypto > card right ? Not as kernel crypto is currently deployed, but the right hooks are there, and when the job is finished (I'm working on it in my Copious Free Time), _all_ kernel crypto should get the benefit of any hardware assistance. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH