From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 19:13:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEEF1065672 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2F48FC16 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp@uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2] (may be forged)) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m1RJDBtj065045; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:13:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from citylink.dinoex.sub.org (uucp@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.14.1/8.14.0/Submit) with UUCP id m1RJDBSc065044; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:13:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by citylink.dinoex.sub.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1RIJ7nR057018; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:19:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@gate.oper.dinoex.org) Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1RIGEG1056726; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:16:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@gate.oper.dinoex.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m1RIGEGX056725; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:16:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:16:14 +0100 From: Peter Much To: Bob Willcox Message-ID: <20080227181613.GA56598@gate.oper.dinoex.org> References: <20080225202309.GA33699@gate.oper.dinoex.org> <20080225212402.GA3003@rancor.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080225212402.GA3003@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 194.45.71.2; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; ) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:13:12 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: idlc looping compiling XContentEnumerationAccess.idl X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:13:38 -0000 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: ! I have them both on as well (from the GENERIC kernel). I don't know just ! when I will be able to try again w/o one or both set. This is my primary ! workstation and at the moment I can't afford to reboot it. Thats fine, thank You. I just hoped this way to find out which of the two options makes the difference. But after I have studied what there is to read about both, I come to the conclusion that this might as well be some kind of interdependency of both. At that point it would go into logically analyzing the kernel code, and I'm actually not in the mood for such... Anyway, I am currently trying with PREEMTION set and ADAPTIVE_GIANT removed (which seems the more sensible approach), and this also seems to work. So this is the setup that is my recommendation, for as long as nobody seems interested in a more detailed analysis and remedy (I did post to freebsd-smp). Voila, case closed. :) rgds, PMc