Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      19 Apr 2003 10:53:22 +0200
From:      Alex Kiesel <alex.kiesel@document-root.de>
To:        Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new target to display options
Message-ID:  <1050742402.237.2.camel@detention.home.ahk>
In-Reply-To: <20030418162439.GA1052@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References:  <20030418101304.GF20941@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20030418122910.5a39bb44.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20030418162439.GA1052@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 18:24, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:29:10PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > 
> > > pre-fetch, post-fetch... How about a new target, say, "options"?
> > 
> > I would like it. I also suggest to create a "standard" how those
> > option-messages have to look. Maybe it's better to create a variable which
> > get parsed like:
> > 
> > PORT_OPTIONS=	WITHOUT_X11:To build the port w/o X11 support \
> > 		WITH_PNG:To build the port with PNG support
> >               
> 
> See also mail/mailman & emulators/xmame for an alternate implementation.

I think those two are a little bit too verbose :) and they are not
parseable. I think it would be nice to have parseable output that you
could easily use in some kind of frontend...

Generally this target is a very good idea.

Greets,
-Alex



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050742402.237.2.camel>