Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:40:04 +0100 From: Radek Kozlowski <radek@raadradd.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: fixes and comments on the upgrade script procedure Message-ID: <20041110014004.GC93706@werd> In-Reply-To: <1100050125.17375.36.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20041109204948.GA1732@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <1100037439.17375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20041110011850.GB28553@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <1100050125.17375.36.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:28:45PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > Yes, but these flags would affect all the ports, wouldn't
> > they? I've just listed openoffice-* in HOLD_PKGS based on
> > the suggestion by Adam W.
>
> Yes, they would affect all ports, but I don't think adding openoffice-*
> to HOLD_PKGS will help. We run portupgrade -f, and that bypasses
> HOLD_PKGS.
I keep it somewhere else:
USE_PKGS_ONLY = [
'*openoffice*',
]
-Radek
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041110014004.GC93706>