From owner-freebsd-alpha  Wed Jul 23 11:19:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-alpha>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA04567
          for alpha-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA04560
          for <alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA15970; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:14:27 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199707231814.LAA15970@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Its arrived
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:14:27 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, cjs@portal.ca, dfr@nlsystems.com, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <8063.869680846@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 23, 97 11:00:46 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Of course, you could be right, and the people who wrote the Linux
> > and the accompanying documentation could be wrong.
> 
> Could be, and considering that I've always booted Linux using ARC, was
> told by Maddog & Aspen Systems both to boot from ARC, and see it as
> the default kernel configuration option (you need to specifically
> enable the SRM support, go look in the Makefiles for yourself), I'd
> say that it's a pretty strong possibility that the doc is indeed wrong
> or you misread it. :)

Heh.  "Still, it boots.".


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.