From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 8 1:55:11 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10AB37B404; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:55:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16Nt0B-000CSP-00; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:57:03 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Ian Dowse Cc: John Baldwin , Wilko Bulte , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall install.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2002 21:12:21 GMT." <200201072112.aa71517@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:57:03 +0200 Message-ID: <47888.1010483823@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 21:12:21 GMT, Ian Dowse wrote: > >Hmm, perhaps sysinstall is overriding newfs in stable still? We > >should see if anyone can reproduce this on -current as well. The > >boot1 code does seem to assume 8192 block size from my reading of it, > >though I'm not 100% sure. > > In fact, this may be a problem on the i386 too. There seems to be an > assumption in sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c that the filesystem block > size is no greater than 8k: Okay, now you're scaring me. What should I do? Should I leave the new newfs defaults intact for 4.5-RC1 so we can get feedback, or should I just back out the newfs defaults changes and play it safe for 4.5-RELEASE? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message