Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:20:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is MinBlock == MaxBlock common? Message-ID: <20030916111926.N9364@root.org> In-Reply-To: <3F660F32.17694.2490D2C@localhost> References: <3F660F32.17694.2490D2C@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > How common is it for a device to have a MinBlock == MaxBlock as in > the following? > > I ask this because this is what it showing up after I patched my > sa(4). See > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=43376+0+current/freebsd- > scsi for details. > > # /usr/local/sbin/tapeinfo -f /dev/pass0 > Product Type: Tape Drive > Vendor ID: 'WANGTEK ' > Product ID: '51000 SCSI M74H' > Revision: '12B3' > Attached Changer: Yes > MinBlock:512 > MaxBlock:512 > Ready: yes Since you effectively hard-coded the blocksize to 512 using the quirk, you're just getting that value sent back to you, not the actual device MODE SENSE page. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030916111926.N9364>