From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 23:29:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7D16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:29:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1271A43D55 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:29:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id CFAC54822; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:29:28 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s129026; Mon, 21 Mar 05 00:29:23 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DB74822 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:29:23 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 3F86038012; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:29:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A47A5C002 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:29:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:29:23 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050320221930.GA11100@fan.priv.at> Message-ID: References: <20050320221930.GA11100@fan.priv.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Xwrapper doesn't use .xinitrc, or does it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:29:31 -0000 I have just rebuilt my system and a few things aren't as they used to be. When I try to start X with Xwrapper no xterms or other windows appear. Isn't Xwrapper starting the stuff in .xinitrc like "startx" used to do for me (but wont do, since it no longer has the authority to do so)?? Isn't there some documentation for Xwrapper somewhere? /Andreas (using RELENG_5_3, if that matters) -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?