From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 21 12:40:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE6F16A400; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCE143D58; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF81B2E0A5; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:40:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMWSPuwAWKmv; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911E62E0A3; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:40:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:40:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <3aaaa3a0604171743y33af6355udf750eca65605920@mail.gmail.com> <44456BC2.1050102@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <44456BC2.1050102@freebsd.org> X-Face: $Ov27?7*N,h60fIEfNJdb!m,@#4T/d; 1hw|W0zvsHM(a$Yn6BYQ0^SEEXvi8>D`|V*F"=?iso-8859-1?q?=5F+R=0A?= 2@Aq>+mNb4`,'[[%z9v0Fa~]AD1}xQO3|>b.z&}l#R-_(P`?@Mz"kS; XC>Eti,i3>%@g?4f,=?iso-8859-1?q?=5Cc7=7CGh=0A?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_wb=26ky=24b2PJ=5E=5C0b83NkLsFKv=7CsmL/cI4UD=25Tu8alAD?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart20108669.Q56TqHmEtN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200604211440.28535.benlutz@datacomm.ch> Cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: portsnap mirror servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:40:33 -0000 --nextPart20108669.Q56TqHmEtN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 19 April 2006 00:44, Colin Percival wrote: > I have a list of people who have offered mirrors, but so far I haven't > seen any need for additional mirrors -- the two which already exist are > showing no signs of slowing down. Hm, but I see a quite noticeable speed difference between portsnap1 and=20 portsnap2. The second one is quite a bit faster. Cheers Benjamin --nextPart20108669.Q56TqHmEtN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBESNK8gShs4qbRdeQRAo7NAJ4wH/hCw0zRmXQV+qu6SFKoKrDn3wCfRyY6 Sx3Amy267OQvDLuqUaQMANc= =ShHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart20108669.Q56TqHmEtN--