From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 27 10: 0:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from riker.skynet.be (riker.skynet.be [195.238.3.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CEB37B719; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:00:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brad.knowles@skynet.be) Received: from [194.78.241.123] ([194.78.241.123]) by riker.skynet.be (8.11.2/8.11.2/Skynet-OUT-2.11) with ESMTP id f1RI00o29145; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:00:00 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from ) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200102270346.UAA10815@usr05.primenet.com> References: <200102270346.UAA10815@usr05.primenet.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:48:22 +0100 To: Terry Lambert From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Design a journalled file system Cc: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, jar@integratus.com (Jack Rusher), sam@errno.com (Sam Leffler), zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu (Zhiui Zhang), freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 3:46 AM +0000 2/27/01, Terry Lambert wrote: > Because you can't ditribute a FreeBSD kernel with GPL'ed code > linked into it legally, due to the GPL disallowing distribution > of the code with non-GPL'ed code. > > Yes, changing the license to the LGPL would fix the problem. Ahh, okay. I haven't been watching the list very closely the last couple of days, and I had somehow come to the mistaken conclusion that your statement was made on the basis of technical reasons as opposed to license issues, and I just couldn't see how there would be technical problems with what you were proposing. Thanks for the clarification! -- ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message