From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 14:27:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6031065673; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81878FC15; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48C51B93B; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:27:50 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Gleb Kurtsou Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 09:41:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p13; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201205181001.q4IA1VED044374@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201205181001.q4IA1VED044374@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205180941.48076.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 18 May 2012 10:27:50 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r235601 - head/include/protocols X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:27:51 -0000 On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > Author: gleb > Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012 > New Revision: 235601 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601 > > Log: > Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition. > > Since ino_t size is about to change to 64-bits, replace ino_t used in > dump protocol definition with 32-bit dump_ino_t to preserve backward > compatibility. At some point, it may be necessary to use spare fields > in struct in order to fully support 64-bit inode numbers. > > Sponsored by: Google Summer of Code 2011 A question about your stat changes: did you expand dev_t to 32 bits for the AFS folks, or did you leave it as 16 bits? -- John Baldwin