From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Aug 29 08:13:19 1995 Return-Path: doc-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id IAA08617 for doc-outgoing; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 08:13:19 -0700 Received: from fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA08609 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 08:13:11 -0700 Received: (from jfieber@localhost) by fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA12268 for doc@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 10:12:47 -0500 From: John Fieber Message-Id: <199508291512.KAA12268@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu> Subject:
tag in sgml documents To: doc@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 10:12:47 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 845 Sender: doc-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I've tracked down the problem with section titles being formatted strangely and/or truncated. The problem is fairly simple, but rather difficult to solve with the current architecture of the conversion system. As such, even though it is valid SGML to omit the
...
tags following a tag, do *not* omit them. Furthermore, the close tag (
) must be on the same line as the open tag (
). There is actually an entire class of tags which could be affected in the same way but I have not gone through to shake them out. I'd rather spend my time building a new processing system that doesn't have the bug. :) I now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ============