From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 19:50:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4190E16A4D1 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A6C43D49 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2AJoGrc093069 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2AJoFCx093068; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:15 GMT Message-Id: <200503101950.j2AJoFCx093068@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: kern/78664: truss does not work on 5-STABLE(5.4-PRERELEASE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:50:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/78664; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: HASHI Hiroaki Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/78664: truss does not work on 5-STABLE(5.4-PRERELEASE) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:49:42 +0300 (MSK) On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, 01:20+0900, HASHI Hiroaki wrote: > In "Re: kern/78664: truss does not work on 5-STABLE(5.4-PRERELEASE)" at Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:50:20 +0300 (MSK) > Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > Does > > > > mount -t procfs proc /proc > > mounted. but not work. > > tomba% mount > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > /dev/da0s1a on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) > procfs on /proc (procfs, local) > linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > devfs on /var/named/dev (devfs, local) I confirm I can reproduce this bug on recent RELENG_5 and fail on HEAD system. -- Maxim Konovalov