From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb  2 12:59:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA13172
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13164
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA02138; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702022057.MAA02138@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu,
        hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: performance puzzler 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Feb 1997 20:20:55 +0200."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.970202201858.13473A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 12:57:58 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of Narvi :

> Where did I read about 66Mhz revision/mode for PCI? Was it in a dream or
> just a "not supported by anybody yet" possibility as is the 64bit card
> width. Or was it all just a dream or erroneus news article?

PCI 2.0 specifies a new 66MHz mode which has been implemented
I believe by SUN. I would look into DEC's Alpha also.

	Amancio