From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 17 04:53:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D27B16A4DE for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from algardo@sura.ru) Received: from mail.sura.ru (mail.sura.ru [80.95.32.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE4C43D53 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:53:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algardo@sura.ru) Received: from guamoko (internal.sura.ru [80.95.32.17]) by mail.sura.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id D05D11052A7 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:53:12 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:53:12 +0400 From: Aleksey Perov To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060817085312.797f7b9f.algardo@sura.ru> In-Reply-To: <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org> References: <44DD4510.5070002@elischer.org> <20060816131824.67a8053b.algardo@sura.ru> <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org> Organization: JSC Volgatelecom, Penza Region, Russia X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-NCC-RegID: ru.penza Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: suggested addition to 'date' X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:53:15 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Aleksey Perov wrote: > > >Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > >>At various times I've wanted to add timestamps to logfiles as they are > >>generated.. > >> > >> > > > >This wheel has been invented million years ago. > > > >Install DJB's daemontools from ports, then run > > ..... > > > I can not install ports onto these machines. They are appliances. > > I will simply put the unhancement in out own cvs tree, and the > enhancement will be private. > I'm still comletely amazed that no-one but me thinks this is a good idea > as it seems absolutly > obvious to me and it doesn't affect date's usual behaviour in the > slightest. Actually I don't object but rather agree that adding such an option to date is a good idea, no matter which letter it would be - "s" or "S" or "p" or "@". As for my previous posting, I just suggested one of many possible solutions, like others in this thread did. -- Aleksey Perov