From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Thu Jun 25 20:37:42 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7CD98D9C3
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com)
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com
 [208.113.200.129])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48CB1042
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com)
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A911805C;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ozzmosis.com; h=date:from
 :to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:
 in-reply-to; s=ozzmosis.com; bh=3g5NpD4qYdEWj4sIq9mxu5XlPDE=; b=
 MAMdePX1IlrL0renqQiuH1ZMQ0Q6pwEzP+8LH7YL8cyTrzAY6QgN3QQsjuN8sgz2
 3M5j5UyBfngqu9mLt/O3Bn0h6twVasST+dTqWXgqkOg+KotZa7Y2dZKMRStSyTwK
 QG1wmAShhUqA2Nu970PmXBgsCQENJCjrrgEvrPkKpVU=
Received: from blizzard.ozzmosis.com (unknown [203.217.88.246])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: relay@ozzmosis.com)
 by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F06F7118057;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by blizzard.ozzmosis.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 2DEA75CF; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:37:38 +1000 (AEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:37:38 +1000
From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com>
To: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any utils worth installing a GUI on a server for?
Message-ID: <20150625203738.GA75991@ozzmosis.com>
References: <558B3F60.7060809@sneakertech.com> <558B41A3.1050506@gmail.com>
 <558B45C1.3040101@sneakertech.com> <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com>
 <20150625065727.e728118a09a939f408ec8526@sohara.org>
 <558C4756.1030805@gmail.com>
 <20150625202835.62d37aed@gumby.homeunix.com>
 <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:37:42 -0000

On Thu 2015-06-25 14:05:55 UTC-0600, jd1008 (jd1008@gmail.com) wrote:

> > FWIW ZFS has been a mainstream FreeBSD feature for some time now. It's
> > licence allowed the SUN code to run in the FreeBSD kernel whereas
> > Linux had to recreate it, or adapt the original version to run in
> > userland.
>
> Yes - the 'fuse' land.
> I would love to see io performance differences between the
> FreeBSD implementation vs the linux implementation.
> I gamble that running zfs in the kernel might provide faster i/o
> but not sure how much faster.

There's also a kernel version of ZFS for Linux, in addition to ZFS on FUSE.

http://zfsonlinux.org/