Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:49:34 +0800
From:      Christopher Hall <christopherhall.hsw@gmail.com>
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: vim default GUI
Message-ID:  <20210803094934.197d01db@e495>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwcj=O3tR8H6hdjKeh5uLu9hS4XimEP0gj6apPb1OJs7phw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <FBF94149-1389-41A4-9071-CF1E3171778A@adamw.org> <20210802120826.3c2t5uzwdhlykbrj@ptrcrt.ch> <2a558213-2cc1-605e-3927-75d83943f633@nomadlogic.org> <CAP7rwcj=O3tR8H6hdjKeh5uLu9hS4XimEP0gj6apPb1OJs7phw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Adam,

On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:18:22 -0600, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:58 AM Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > would the idea be to deprecate the "vim-console" port?
> >  
> 
> The idea is that the `vim-console' package would become just `vim',
> and the current `vim' would become `vim-gtk3'. The `vim-tiny' package
> would stay as-is. So the vim package will depend only on exctags and
> the default language bindings (currently perl, ruby, and py3). Only
> the -xyz packages will carry X dependencies.

I currently install vim-console for the xxd program which I use in some
scripts. Will is still get installed?

> 
> Frankly, I think it's highly, highly unlikely that anybody actually
> uses the ruby or perl bindings. I'm contemplating taking RUBY and
> PERL out of OPTIONS_DEFAULT, and I doubt anyone will notice (they'll
> remain as available configurable options).
> 
> # Adam
> 
> -- 
> Adam Weinberger
> adamw@adamw.org
> https://www.adamw.org


-- 
Best Regards.
Christopher Hall.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210803094934.197d01db>