From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 3 9:43:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F87037BBAE for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 09:43:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA65656; Wed, 3 May 2000 09:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDC261952; Wed, 3 May 2000 12:15:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:15:53 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: USE_AUTOMAKE directive Message-ID: <20000503121553.B364@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <200005031547.AAA26484@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200005031547.AAA26484@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp>; from kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp on Thu, May 04, 2000 at 12:47:43AM +0900 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 12:47:43AM +0900, kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp wrote: > GNU automake directive would be enable by USE_AUTOMAKE=yes with my > following patch. I tested mail/wmmail but in this port > USE_AUTOMAKE=yes may be meaningless ;) I think you got your patch backwards. :-) In any case, I'm not sure if it's such a great idea to have either USE_AUTO[CONF,MAKE] in bsd.port.mk in the first place. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message