From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 20:48:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D68516A41F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:48:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.stable@melvyn.homeunix.org) Received: from sarevok.lan.melvyn.homeunix.org (i153153.upc-i.chello.nl [62.195.153.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A8343D46 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.stable@melvyn.homeunix.org) Received: by sarevok.lan.melvyn.homeunix.org (Postfix, from userid 100) id 762A9114F6; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:48:26 +0100 (CET) From: Melvyn Sopacua To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:48:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512212148.26024.freebsd.stable@melvyn.homeunix.org> Subject: Re: em bad performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:48:28 -0000 On Wednesday 21 December 2005 17:55, Danny Braniss wrote: > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > the em performance under 6.0-stable is half of any other box i have, > and a similar mb running linux gives about 1GB, so > > Q: any ideas what can be wrong? With or without polling. Seen reports of polling enabled drivers without polling enabled are very slow. According to polling(4), em is polling capable. -- Melvyn Sopacua freebsd.stable@melvyn.homeunix.org FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE Qt: 3.3.5 KDE: 3.4.3