From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 11:01:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC8516A4CE for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 11:01:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B1C43D1D for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 11:01:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004020719014701600f3q72e>; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:01:47 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 61AAD11; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:01:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Roland Wells" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Feb 2004 14:01:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44u1224stg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Sjaak Nabuurs Subject: Re: Routing 4 network cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:01:48 -0000 "Roland Wells" writes: > I guess this is more a question (that could be a possible solution); > > Could you just Bridge all the seperate physical networks, and leave > firewalling and NAT to be done by the router, or lets say, on another > FreeBSD box connected to the dsl modem? In principle, yes. However, all of those networks are wireless, so my guess would be that they are in different places. Or there might be some gain from logical isolation. Or some combination of the two. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public"