From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Jun 5 17:56:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4E9332AEE; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49dr1W3wkKz4Qk7; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1591379788; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8XgkWffnM6QPuxHRUVZoqbydAmNkrM/bhD07Hv7t1JQ=; b=PqpUdr1Jrw3rcgKu0KwTONiCdxj0XCKcFE8/y8tMtX0c7/bHkxSDhNHUUWdPlIRaPZ6Oku m4f0S2oYYKGZacrkhFc9PWCmqM5ptmaHBRlH+RFZ9wywkVhejOQP9Zd8gSm0OrutgYcVX3 Df/O0WN5z4Uu7ZqkKjYNX4NaXYjOgjQ= Received: from skull.home.blih.net (lfbn-idf2-1-900-181.w86-238.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.238.131.181]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1d144c8c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:56:27 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Piotr Kubaj , Emmanuel Vadot , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r538032 - head/graphics/mesa-dri Message-Id: <20200605195627.1fd32ddc14e4e933691a0a9a@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <20200605174803.GA93715@FreeBSD.org> References: <202006051618.055GIwUd009991@repo.freebsd.org> <20200605165501.GC2013@KGPE-D16> <20200605174803.GA93715@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49dr1W3wkKz4Qk7 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=PqpUdr1J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.21)[-0.210]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.023]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:56:33 -0000 On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:48:03 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:55:01PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > Please don't do that. GCC architectures (11 and 12) use only ld.bfd. > > You just broke all of them. > > Seeing all this mesa ports fallout (just looking at the number of > PRs closed as duplicates of 246997) I'm starting to wonder whether > that switch to meson was poorly tested and should be just backed > out. Looks like it made quite a few people rather unhappy. > > ./danfe It was indeed poorly tested and I'm taking the blame for that. It will not be backed out as I'm still fixing stuff and everything will be ok later tonight. As for people being unhappy I understand, I should have made more test on i386 and 11 and will do that in the future. For the wayland dependancy breakage, well I cannot test everything but I will have a patch that do a better job soon. -- Emmanuel Vadot