From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 2 4: 6:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E38215036; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA50754; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:05:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: John-Mark Gurney Cc: Sheldon Hearn , hackers@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services References: <70382.933458817@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <19990731161854.11826@hydrogen.fircrest.net> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 02 Aug 1999 13:05:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney's message of "Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:18:54 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John-Mark Gurney writes: > Sheldon Hearn scribbled this message on Aug 1: > > Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port numbers > > instead of service names? > I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a > service name... it should be very easy to make the modification, and > I'm willing to do all the work, assuming no one on -committers objects.. The correct way to do this is to fix getservbyname() so it accepts port numbers. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message