Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:23:53 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru> Cc: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: i386 binaries on amd64: ldconfig problems Message-ID: <4FC762D9.905@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <201205311122.q4VBMqca090606@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <201205311122.q4VBMqca090606@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
31.05.2012 18:22, Oliver Fromme пишет:
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > 31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes:
> > > The library search order is LD_{32}_LIBRARY_PATH, then DT_RPATH from
> > > the binary, then hints, then /lib:/usr/lib. So if rpath of the binary
> > > contains /usr/local/lib, you get /usr/local/lib before hints.
> > >
> > > Rtld uses only the search path from the hints file. When a library with
> > > the matched name found, rtld tries to load it. Regardless of the result
> > > of the load attempt, further components of the search path list are not
> > > tried.
> > >
> > > Look at the olvwm binary with readelf and see whether DT_RPATH specifies
> > > /usr/local/lib.
> >
> > I've faced exactly same problem. What can be done other to rebuild
> > of all such 32bit bit binaries to make them work for transition period?
> > Should libmap32.conf help? It seems it does not.
>
> Does LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH not work for you?
I did not know about it. Now I've rebuilt all ports as 64 bit already.
But I will try it for next migration :-)
Euge Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC762D9.905>