Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:06:47 +0200
From:      Valentin Nechayev <netch@netch.kiev.ua>
To:        Steve Wingate <s.wingate@pobox.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Dualbooting STABLE & CURRENT
Message-ID:  <20031102090647.GA3058@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20031101203741.S621@daemon.g-e-e-k.net>
References:  <20031101131821.U253@daemon.g-e-e-k.net> <20031101161947.M70057@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031101202118.Q70057@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031101203741.S621@daemon.g-e-e-k.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 20:38:36, s.wingate (Steve Wingate) wrote about "Re: Dualbooting STABLE & CURRENT": 

> >> I don't like the sound of that. I'll just stick with STABLE until 5.x is
> >> really ready.
>> -STABLE will have the same problem since its in boot0 and the BIOS, not
>> the OS on the partition its trying to boot.
SW> Actually STABLE will have no problems as it's been running on this box for
SW> over a year.

You have working STABLE on first disk, not on second.

Well, please show fdisk output for both disks.


-netch-



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031102090647.GA3058>