Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:46:48 +1000 From: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Pete Carah <pete@ns.altadena.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tool make ordering, or something Message-ID: <20021002164648.A79780@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: <200210020537.g925bQB1092943@ns.altadena.net>; from pete@ns.altadena.net on Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:26PM -0700 References: <200210020537.g925bQB1092943@ns.altadena.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:26PM -0700, Pete Carah wrote: > There is a 't' modifier to a format in bin/sh that just crept in; > it prevents a cross buildworld under stable without NO_WERROR. > > Perhaps the compiler+libc needs to be built first? (and does sh > need to be a build tool; I'd hope the make scripts stuck to a > fairly least-common-denominator shell syntax?) The best we can do to src/bin/sh is to do something like this: #ifndef BOOTSTRAPPING fmtstr(s, 64, "[%td] ", jp - jobtab + 1); #else fmtstr(s, 64, "[%lld] ", (long long)(jp - jobtab + 1)); #endif This isn't a particularly good example, because jp - jobtab + 1 is almost always less than 1000. I think there are only 3 places that use new printf format specifiers that aren't in -stable: miscbltin.c lines 429,455, jobs.c line 224. I don't know why sh needs to be a build tool anymore, but I'll probably just add the #ifdef's for the moment. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021002164648.A79780>