From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 15 08:08:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1264B16A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:08:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f19.mail.ru (f19.mail.ru [194.67.57.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8995243D1D for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from _pppp@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f19.mail.ru with local id 1DB76Y-0005xM-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:08:42 +0300 Received: from [81.200.13.122] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:08:42 +0300 From: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> To: Marc G.Fournier Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [81.200.13.122] Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:08:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20050315011200.G92893@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High ping latency using two ethernet under FreeBSD 4.11 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:08:44 -0000 > Testing my network, I just noticed the following: > > --- 200.46.204.1 ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 399.664/407.119/420.315/8.267 ms > > --- 200.46.208.1 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 373.045/409.266/453.402/33.280 ms > > 400ms to my default router seems a wee bit high ... > > I'm suspecting that it has to do with: > > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune last message repeated 10 times > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune /kernel: arp: 200.46.204.1 is on em0 but got reply from 00:0b:bf:42:a8:06 on em1 > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune /kernel: arp: 200.46.208.1 is on em1 but got reply from 00:0b:bf:42:a8:06 on em0 > > In order to provide network redundancy, and simplify our scripting, with > have one network bound to one ethernet port, and the other network bound > to the second one on the same machine ... > > I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on > the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'? Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though. > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >