From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 20:07:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0256D106566C; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F169E8FC38; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n59K7YwP008309; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:07:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n59K7XtU008306; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:07:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:07:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <20090609.195750.41709103.sthaug@nethelp.no> Message-ID: References: <20090609172142.GA92146@ebi.local> <20090609.195750.41709103.sthaug@nethelp.no> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:22:18 +0000 Cc: snb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, dan.naumov@gmail.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall, GJOURNAL and ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:07:42 -0000 >> problem has since been fixed. > > I've had several cases that needed manual fsck. After I turned off > background fsck, the problems stopped. These days background_fsck="NO" > is a standard part of my rc.conf. and mine. actually snapshots doesn't work on large partitions - could simply crash. that's why i wrote that UFS has practically no bugs, except snapshots. But i don't see it as a problem. i don't like my system to start unchecked and then be "background" checked. this background checking slows down system so much and takes more time than foreground checking. FreeBSD really doesn't crash every day, so what a problem to just do fsck at start and wait a bit.