From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 12:39:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D7870; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Tom.Lislegaard@proact.no) Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA59F8FC08; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail42-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.242) by AM1EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.3.204.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:42 +0000 Received: from mail42-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail42-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5488134019E; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:212.214.215.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:semtaout01.proact.se; RD:semtaout01.proact.se; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -3 X-BigFish: VPS-3(zzbb2dI542M1432Izz1de0h1d18h1202h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah8275dhz2dh668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h15d0l1155h) Received: from mail42-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail42-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1353587980361081_6246; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.231]) by mail42-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5F93C00F7; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from semtaout01.proact.se (212.214.215.133) by AM1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.3.207.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:39 +0000 Received: from Semail04.proact.local (unknown [10.7.1.58]) by semtaout01.proact.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE545727C; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:39:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from SEMAIL03.proact.local ([fe80::a52b:385d:b44f:ecb9]) by Semail04.proact.local ([fe80::885:6e64:c1e6:dcf1%20]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:39:33 +0100 From: Tom Lislegaard To: 'Andriy Gapon' Subject: RE: AcpiOsAcquireObject crash [Was: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource] Thread-Topic: AcpiOsAcquireObject crash [Was: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource] Thread-Index: AQHNvc81+Z+//tujgE2NCdmsWuXGgZfhbFxQgAAIXwCABmv7oP//9iUAgAFRP4CADLUHAA== Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5092F209.7090803@FreeBSD.org> <50979BCD.3060000@FreeBSD.org> <5097CB27.8040802@FreeBSD.org> <5097F24D.7040206@FreeBSD.org> <50995C8F.3040309@FreeBSD.org> <509B8F15.4030300@FreeBSD.org> <509BDF86.3080502@FreeBSD.org> <509D091A.8080108@FreeBSD.org> <50A263E8.2060707@FreeBSD.org> <50A37ECF.1070803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50A37ECF.1070803@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.7.1.59] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: proact.no Cc: "freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:avg@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: 14. november 2012 12:22 > To: Tom Lislegaard > Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: AcpiOsAcquireObject crash [Was: 9-Stable panic: resource_lis= t_unreserve: can't find > resource] >=20 > on 13/11/2012 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I have a better patch, which I tested at least. I'll send it to you so= on-ish. >=20 > Here is a tested version of the ref-count patch (still a little bit exper= imental): > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi-ref-count-exp.diff >=20 > -- > Andriy Gapon I've had the patched kernel running for nearly one week without any panic o= r other acpi related problems so I think it's safe to say this patch is goo= d. Thanks. Any idea when this (and the previous patch for the resource_list_unreserve = problem) can be committed? I suppose it will have to be sometime after 9.1-= RELEASE? -tom