Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:32 +0000 From: Tom Lislegaard <Tom.Lislegaard@proact.no> To: 'Andriy Gapon' <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: AcpiOsAcquireObject crash [Was: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource] Message-ID: <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F209287B9@Semail03.proact.local> In-Reply-To: <50A37ECF.1070803@FreeBSD.org> References: <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F2091F824@Semail03.proact.local> <5092F209.7090803@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20920DD1@Semail03.proact <5093BECC.1030709@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20921BAC@Semail03.proact.local> <50979BCD.3060000@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20921C47@Semail03.proact.local> <5097CB27.8040802@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20921C6A@Semail03.proact.local> <5097F24D.7040206@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F209220E2@Semail03.proact.local> <50995C8F.3040309@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20922E13@Semail03.proact.local> <509B8F15.4030300@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20922F57@Semail03.proact.local> <509BDF86.3080502@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F2092347A@Semail03.proact.local> <509D091A.8080108@FreeBSD.org> <E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F20924820@Semail03.proact.local> <50A263E8.2060707@FreeBSD.org> <50A37ECF.1070803@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:avg@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: 14. november 2012 12:22 > To: Tom Lislegaard > Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: AcpiOsAcquireObject crash [Was: 9-Stable panic: resource_lis= t_unreserve: can't find > resource] >=20 > on 13/11/2012 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I have a better patch, which I tested at least. I'll send it to you so= on-ish. >=20 > Here is a tested version of the ref-count patch (still a little bit exper= imental): > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi-ref-count-exp.diff >=20 > -- > Andriy Gapon I've had the patched kernel running for nearly one week without any panic o= r other acpi related problems so I think it's safe to say this patch is goo= d. Thanks. Any idea when this (and the previous patch for the resource_list_unreserve = problem) can be committed? I suppose it will have to be sometime after 9.1-= RELEASE? -tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8A24BEFDC390C4491718DEE8A9C4F209287B9>