From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 29 10:12:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4763D08; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB93526E9; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA24923; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:12:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VEzDF-0002oI-Py; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:12:25 +0300 Message-ID: <521F1E51.80309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:11:29 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jase Thew Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] change in devfs path matching logic References: <51F28A33.7040209@FreeBSD.org> <52176C7B.4070701@FreeBSD.org> <20130824230324.12371xhs3clidbi8@webmail.raad.tartu.ee> <521E3394.5050000@FreeBSD.org> <521EFCAB.5030200@FreeBSD.org> <521F0F5E.3070900@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <521F0F5E.3070900@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:28 -0000 on 29/08/2013 12:07 Jase Thew said the following: > After some fiddling about, I've obtained a crashdump of this panic : > > http://goo.gl/sRXjo4 > > If you need anything else, please let me know. Obviously, I can't do anything with the vmcore without the matching kernel (and perhaps modules). Also, kgdb and libkvm.so from the matching system can be needed. Perhaps you could try examining the devfs_rule_run frame to give a start? Like listing the source code line and examining all local variables. Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon