From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 20:11:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D2716A4DC for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:11:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AD543D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rodrigc@crodrigues.org) Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com ([66.30.114.143]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005010820111501600269eme>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:11:16 +0000 Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j08KB9FW004214; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:11:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rodrigc@h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com) Received: (from rodrigc@localhost)j08KAx4N004200; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:10:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rodrigc) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:10:59 -0500 From: Craig Rodrigues To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20050108201059.GA4161@crodrigues.org> References: <20050108071324.GA32371@crodrigues.org> <20050108034714.40f42462@dolphin.local.net> <20050108185044.GA57045@crodrigues.org> <20050108192135.GD8265@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050108192135.GD8265@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Hack to sysctl kern.osreldate, for ports cluster X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:11:17 -0000 On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:21:35AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > > This hack to sysctl which I provided is not for general use > > and should only be used in Kris's chroot'd environment which > > he uses to build the ports. > > The problem I see with this is that you're forcing other users of > chroot's to install the same ugly hack. Well, Kris's chroot'd environment already has a dummy uname (according to http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ ), so why not a dummy sysctl? -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org