Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:53:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102131349340.62815-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <200102130654.f1D6sIU59242@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> writes: > > > > Well, it almost works but falls over during the build of perl: > > > > > > This is an unrelated bug which the patch uncovers, Peter just fixed it > > > an hour ago. Update your sources and try again. > > > > A post-perl-fix buildworld finished while I drove home. An installworld is > > in progress.. > > The tail of which just ended with the usual: > > ... > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe > I don't understand. If this build was with the version number bumped to 501, what is is causing the problem. In general, if we can construct a build which actually works, I fully support the idea of using three digit version numbers during development. The last thing we need is for people to waste valuable development time working around version number problems. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0102131349340.62815-100000>