Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:42:41 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard <norgaard@locolomo.org> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= <pmaechler@glattnet.ch>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP Messages Message-ID: <47C42561.5000005@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mel wrote: > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 Mächler Philippe wrote: > >> %netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use >> Netif Expire > >> 192.168.2 192.168.3.254 UGS 0 8209 >> bge1 >> 192.168.3 link#2 UC 0 0 >> bge1 > > These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause it's > nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1. Any > chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it, where it > should be 80.242 something? > Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears. > This part is ok if you see the schema in OPs later mail. Erik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47C42561.5000005>