From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 10:55:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5DF106567A for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@qxnitro.org) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146198FC21 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so11454407ggn.13 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxnitro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o4aXdEqovaTe3cUANHwX/PsS8Yl0v619U+HL8YCvmIE=; b=HUg/XYuB1iKFGygeyTc6Fb/WN+Da+YMS3hHw4al4YNyftfQ6gzj9DiOUxofVtzK2wx 84nl0t1En3n7YLh1mlmgY6MsDkg9hTyUuj1aeG5pb60FxT4XWTSPh5aENaZSqT12ciD3 IBO7+IW22l7H/dsvZH90llgm/ZX8v5S7orCII= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=o4aXdEqovaTe3cUANHwX/PsS8Yl0v619U+HL8YCvmIE=; b=gdbBeEchgTiVt0h5rFlvB3zg4QPBSzACpaxhhLH7ckDRHY7fGeyu/P0oBrsrBL9cBB twD6P6Qa1IJF2D0XZpkxAkMedxA8EjfmaC0u4z6wj2CMQ32zMKTqVRjckC8i7zPmhrq0 fe4AQlrnV40Hqxxb3YVsanwZPUYVI3fhgWhd1P8ACF9sLUNC5+osi4ffgLfL/xVfSZ1s 9VhfaKFURBx4CViyMSvdNUltjr+ZHFV6eKuJK/DLH9GP+hjku3kNJYnzUYTLqEi3Tkj3 YH9ZcfV+XYkFyW/ojdkP8RrGPDLp/NVnkyY1B88oIQNECrP6k6pZbPqBRx33pFfbTKIs qIEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.148.196 with SMTP id s4mr20011186icv.19.1341831327299; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: simon@qxnitro.org Received: by 10.64.18.206 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 03:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [172.28.125.126] In-Reply-To: <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <0AFE3C4A-22DB-4134-949F-4D05BBFC4C6C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org> <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:55:27 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: g0yRvJ7WuSAqHvJ0qMzSARQLKaM Message-ID: From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" To: Doug Barton , =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuzG1Xv2vG1qEGqBMEjspub2ZPJX3BJ3WHXi6p9io/BDF1yzBLyQ0j2KeljF462ZTHZS5q Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Hackers , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:55:28 -0000 On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > Unbound has different policies and release schedules that are more in > line with ours. So in the short term (as in, the next few years) we're > better off with unbound in the base. Where is there information about this / what is their support? When I looked at their website I found nothing about security support, branch handling etc. and nobody has replied to that part in these threads (unless I missed it - I just rescanned thread without seeing a reply). -- Simon L. B. Nielsen