From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 13 17:14:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D8416A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:14:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462B343D49
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:14:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id C1B2C14912; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:14:09 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:14:09 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: h <h@erathia.be>
In-Reply-To: <200502131508.02624.h@erathia.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502131108250.3668-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: oryx@ungulate.net
Subject: Re: dhid-5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:14:10 -0000

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, h wrote:

> why is dns/dhid-5.2 not in ports? only the version 4 has been there for ages.

There hasn't been a maintainer-update to this port in several years.
This is usually a sign that someone has moved on to other interests :-)

Someone has submitted http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?q=77127
which does the update; by next week it should be committable with a
maintainer timeout.  If the maintainer wants to keep the port, he or
she should speak up now ...

mcl