From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 12 08:59:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2218106564A for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2898FC13 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1MF2bf-0006Q1-OQ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:59:27 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: pyunyh@gmail.com In-reply-to: <20090612082212.GE72855@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20090612082212.GE72855@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> Comments: In-reply-to Pyun YongHyeon message dated "Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:22:12 +0900." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:59:27 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk/stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:59:30 -0000 > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:57:42AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > > latest -stable (June 11) is causing problems: > > MB is intel SE7320VP21, > > > > msk0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:0c:6a:85:a8 > > miibus0: on msk0 > > e1000phy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > > e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > > > > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > > ... > > > > I think there was not much msk(4) changes in stable. msk(4) in > CURRENT has a lot changes to support newer controllers. Does msk(4) > in CURRENT make any difference? > Also please show me dmesg output(msk(4) related one) to know which > controller you have. hrumph, missed some lines: mskc0: port 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xdeefc000-0xdeefffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 msk0: on mskc0 msk0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:0c:6a:85:a8 miibus0: on msk0 miibus0: on msk0 e1000phy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto mskc0: [FILTER] > > Btw, are you using MSI? yes, but it was (so it seemed) working ok. i'll try again soon without msi. in the meantime, Im running an older kernel, trying to finish a very long process (svn/svk), which when done, I will be able to compile current. thanks, danny