From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 21:41:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A2016A421 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A718943D66 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 23175 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2005 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 19 Oct 2005 21:41:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2868 invoked by uid 89); 19 Oct 2005 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2005 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD61115F7; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:41:48 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:41:48 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20051020004148.5e9b4605@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051019213522.GA60635@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051019175832.GL93128@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051019211509.1ea7d219@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051019184035.GA10401@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051019222617.1684bc7d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051019193949.GB27229@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051019233015.3de4a212@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051019210440.GA44472@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051019211733.GA26059@soaustin.net> <20051019212642.GA60421@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051020003323.26389393@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051019213522.GA60635@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: package-depend oddity (was: Re: [ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: dspampd-2.00.r2 failed on i386 5] ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:41:53 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:35:22 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:33:23AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:26:42 -0400 > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:33PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > Why does it depend on both clamavs ? > > > > > > > > > > From some dependency..you'd have to trace through to see which > > > > > one. > > > > > > > > Hmm ... the interactive page below isn't showing it: > > > > > > > > http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portdependencytree.py?category=mail&portname=dspampd > > > > > > Looks like clamav came in with the recent commit to dspam-devel 2 > > > days ago (also by the same maintainer ;-). > > > > > > OK, I see it now. So ... I should depend on clam instead of > > clamav-devel in dspampd to match the defaults from dspam-devel > > (which will be dspam in a few days) > > > > > > - OPTIONS+= CLAMAV "Use clamav as antivir module" off > > - OPTIONS+= CLAMAV_DEVEL "Use clamav as antivir module" on > > + OPTIONS+= CLAMAV "Use clamav as antivir module" on > > + OPTIONS+= CLAMAV_DEVEL "Use clamav as antivir module" off > > That would do it. And as you say, I maintain both ports :) And I was really happy with this time speed of dspam :( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87691 -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"