From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 13 09:03:25 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D123DF5B;
 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:03:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.212.171])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7B03C4;
 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn17so5397520wib.4
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:03:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
 :user-agent; bh=c1PZB+5icM4J5djo0iZmj/jDtSxpsk3iM2Or0obIS2w=;
 b=VSnf3tS+ebuwCpwVGrIsFzySl1a/WS5KmWbkQCy2MZ3rKv06a9TvwMI3imsTox5uuZ
 IzFUrlGx1Aed/mEgkix0SNOCMU27HjoIl1DkzNyE/mxHnLYh59OgGXWttlZDIczigThi
 /T9g6xJKMLfeemdQgBzmLtEJmL0bZHzsKYkm7fWAD234dThGqNlULW3vEXjJfpg7Cd0y
 I4z1TYgUvBLJ4iVfWX47H6tR54AHSEgz7/z+V99Wh9DbjUOfuk3rt6TNz+oQ6Nu0n114
 IK0k4i1gIUXV5hEeD7IFO9Cex6hXmBToIhpSiL4zJTOyDlo8UX3ZHxcEGUCL/3w2AII0
 6J0Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.87.100 with SMTP id w4mr1936882wjz.48.1360746204075;
 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s8sm41252143wif.9.2013.02.13.01.03.22
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:03:20 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Marking some FS as jailable
Message-ID: <20130213090320.GC44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <20130212194047.GE12760@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: fs@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:03:25 -0000


--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:06:29PM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> On 02/12/13 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to mark some filesystem as jailable, here is the one I nee=
d:
> > linprocfs, tmpfs and fdescfs, I was planning to do it with adding a
> > allow.mount.${fs} for each one.
> >
> > Anyone has an objection?
> >
> > regards,
> > Bapt
>=20
> Would it make sense for linprocfs to use the existing allow.mount.procfs
> flag?

ok I'll have a look at how it is done, I will also use the same for linsysf=
s as
they are quite close.

regards,
Bapt

--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEbVtgACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwzzACgr+Jhc7WX6iX+Qb3Mz/KgqsUM
cKoAn2wPZ3qy6FPb9G/rgaPOWdEd8wqo
=C7o2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0--