From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  7 22:25:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CBD1065686
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2012 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ken@kdm.org)
Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0EE8FC0A
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2012 22:25:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q27MPkMC038598;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:25:46 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org)
Received: (from ken@localhost)
	by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id q27MPkTG038597;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:25:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:25:46 -0700
From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>
To: Chuck Tuffli <chuck@tuffli.net>
Message-ID: <20120307222546.GA38581@nargothrond.kdm.org>
References: <CAM0tzX1=OrfYK3za9s5xkiUDmnO=maHPbhmyv0k50y=6-WTT9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120306001731.GA38229@nargothrond.kdm.org>
	<CAM0tzX2y=Nh7MjM+DhZJu-CPYqUhvBsJCVjPsagTXmR3v_2_Hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120307202200.GA23825@nargothrond.kdm.org>
	<CAM0tzX1a1-Hen=tXpmkbWdac0xtP=AnYHrrupqNT2uVx_4AzOw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM0tzX1a1-Hen=tXpmkbWdac0xtP=AnYHrrupqNT2uVx_4AzOw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Cc: freebsd-scsi <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] CTL should check condition INQUIRY with invalid LUN
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:25:47 -0000

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 14:17:14 -0800, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Kenneth D. Merry <ken@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 16:30:22 -0800, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> ...
> >> Linux does issue REPORT LUNs, but most of the time, this gets
> >> check-conditioned with illegal request, overlapped commands attempted.
> >
> > Hmm, that sounds suspicious. ?What is the exact ASC/ASCQ reported?
> >
> > Are you setting the tag_action field in the ATIO that gets sent to CTL?
> > Only one untagged command is allowed at a time.
> 
> Ooops, no I wasn't. Fixed that and the illegal request check condition
> has gone away (tnx!)

Ahh, cool.  So is Linux probing things properly now?

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@FreeBSD.ORG