From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 2 14:18:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2235916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 14:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-49-130.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.49.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB64443D41 for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 14:18:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BKOMB-000ArP-BU; Sun, 02 May 2004 23:18:41 +0200 Message-ID: <409565AE.4020609@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 23:18:38 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews References: <20040501235333.GA84676@yashin.myname.mydomain> <40943C5B.4040501@fillmore-labs.com> <20040502090242.GA85884@yashin.myname.mydomain> <4094D213.9030600@fillmore-labs.com> <40951F5C.1050709@fillmore-labs.com> <20040502210635.GN34693@sirius.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20040502210635.GN34693@sirius.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New category `lingo'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 21:18:42 -0000 Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:18:36PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>One thing that you can do though is to create a new category `lingo' which >>will host all ports that refer to an port of another language, and then >>leave out this category togehter with all other language ports. The might >>help category misc too, which has too many ports anyway. >> >>Since this seems to be an often requested feature, I can compile a list >>of ports the move if there is enough interest. > > I don't think this is a good idea... we're always going to have > some exceptions. We should simply require people to sync the > whole tree... it's not that big of a deal to do this. Anyway, it might make sense to move textproc/??-aspell, misc/koffice-i18n-?? and misc/kde3-i18n-??, maybe editors/openoffice-1.0- and www/frontpage-?? too. -Oliver