From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 29 11: 0:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (grimreaper.grondar.za [196.7.18.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C2C37B978 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:00:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15769; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:14:58 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200006281214.OAA15769@grimreaper.grondar.za> To: "George W. Dinolt" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bootstrapping perl ... References: <3959BA98.69D3D1E3@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <3959BA98.69D3D1E3@pacbell.net> ; from "George W. Dinolt" "Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:43:04 MST." Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:14:58 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am not sure who is supposed to manage the fact that > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk doesn't yet know about perl-5.006. One > appears to need to set PERL_VER and PERL_VERSION. I just added an ."if > {OSVERSION} >= 500006" , but this clearly isn't enough for people who > have yet to upgrade to the newest "current'. Does this mean that the > OSVERSION needs to be incremented to indicate the perl upgrade? I need to get this past Satoshi. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message