Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:47:10 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smp router Message-ID: <gnkniq$528$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20090212115039.GV63561@korolev-net.ru> References: <20090212115039.GV63561@korolev-net.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig945304D2B65116B8F30FC242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Evgenii Davidov wrote: > tell me please: > in freebsd 7 do the kernel processes such as routing, ipfw, nat, dummyn= et use more than one cpu? > i have about 3k packets per second, will it be sme advantage of running= smp router? I think 3k packets per second is too low for you to experience CPU power shortage. Maybe this will help you: http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html --------------enig945304D2B65116B8F30FC242 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmd4XMACgkQldnAQVacBcgefACeIL8gHRb1DeNm/GyGXo9s/mY9 xjgAn3PiGcLOPw7ZWsO2SRtALhNu8s3q =Y+uF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig945304D2B65116B8F30FC242--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gnkniq$528$1>