From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 3 06:23:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA10294 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 06:23:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA10285 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 06:23:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se) Received: (from karpen@localhost) by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA05837; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 16:20:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from karpen) From: Mikael Karpberg Message-Id: <199804031420.QAA05837@ocean.campus.luth.se> Subject: Re: bcopy implementation In-Reply-To: <857m57c8tr.fsf@localhost.zilker.net> from Dave Marquardt at "Apr 3, 98 07:51:12 am" To: marquard@zilker.net (Dave Marquardt) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 16:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Dave Marquardt: > > of not implementing this method in libc? > > Well, you said it yourself. "On the assumption, that the system has > pentium processor...." Well, we can't assume that, since FreeBSD runs > on 386s and up. Well, if you want everything to go faster, you optimize for the hardware you're actually gonna run on. Now, it would be quite possible too add ifdefs so that you would add -DOPTIMIZE_FOR_PENTIUM to CFLAGS in make.conf and then make world. And libc would be compiled with that optimization, etc. /Mikael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message