From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:55:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6D416A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:55:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBA913C46A for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OItsqL005506; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 49910404DE; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:55:54 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-9dd4bbb0000007ff-0a-462e52bafc14 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 34F7040080; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:55:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis> References: <002201c786a2$1ff7b5a0$0202a8c0@artemis> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:55:53 -0700 To: Alexandre DELAY X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE : NFS with Dynamic IP clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:55:56 -0000 On Apr 24, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Alexandre DELAY wrote: > Why not, but my probem is that my NFS server must accept 300 clients. > Using a VPN for each client will probably use a lot of processor > ressources. > Moreover I'm not sure it is possible to get so much VPN connections > on a > server. For 300 clients, you'd want a separate, dedicated VPN router, most likely-- Cisco and others make 'em. > Maybe I must use a different transfert protocol than NFS!? Apache2 + WebDAV, perhaps? -- -Chuck