From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 13 04:04:00 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA25936 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 04:04:00 -0700 Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA25928 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 04:03:58 -0700 Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0t3hu9-0003vkC; Fri, 13 Oct 95 04:03 PDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA01615; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 12:03:54 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: John Hay cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: IPX now available In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Oct 1995 12:44:32 +0200." <199510131044.MAA19862@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 12:03:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1613.813582233@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Can we agree on libipx.a ? > > > > Yes, before you ask: I would really prefer a libtcpip.a too, but I also > > realize it's not practical. > > > Don't forget libns.a, libccitt.a, libiso.a etc...... :-) I wouldn't bother with libiso.a :-) > I am happy to do it that way for ipx. You don't mention libipx.so.x.x. I > don't think a sharable libipx is worth it, with just 2 functions??? I guess not, but it's not a big deal, just a minor change to a makefile... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. It will be some time yet before progress goes too far... (Poul Henningsen)