From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  1 21:56:51 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 59C2C16A4CE; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 21:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D61B043FF7; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 21:56:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12057;
	Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:56:37 +1100
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:56:37 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20031202033941.GA98836@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <20031202165346.P10017@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <20031129000133.GA30662@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20031129163105.GA32651@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20031201182219.O4431@gamplex.bde.org>
	<20031202091936.I8778@gamplex.bde.org>
	<20031202033941.GA98836@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Implementing C99's roundf(), round(), and roundl()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:56:51 -0000

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Steve Kargl wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:57:33AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > RIght, but we have fpgetsticky(), etc.
>
> Can we use fpgetsticky() and friends to implement
> parts of <fenv.h> or does this cause some (disallowed)
> namespace pollution?

Not quite, and yes.  The fp* namespace basically needs to be cloned
instead of layered over.

Bruce